← All pages
New York

Skipped – insufficient data

Summary

This page was not generated because fewer than three studios met the threshold for genuinely LGBTQ+-theme-relevant reviews.

Extraction details

Filtering analysis

The 12 search keywords cast a deliberately wide net, but the vast majority of matches were false positives for the LGBTQ+ Inclusive theme:

“trans” matches (most frequent trigger)

Nearly all matched “transitions,” “transformative,” “transformed,” “transport,” or “transcends” – standard fitness vocabulary for describing class flow and personal progress. These are not LGBTQ+-relevant.

“inclusive” matches

Reviews used “inclusive” to mean beginner-friendly, all-levels, or generally welcoming class environments (e.g., “Very inclusive and beginner-friendly,” “inclusive of all levels,” “inclusive for beginners”). None specifically referenced LGBTQ+ inclusivity.

“pride” matches

Every match used “pride” in the sense of personal pride or professional pride (e.g., “takes pride in her work,” “sense of pride for myself”). Zero references to LGBTQ+ Pride.

“affirming” matches

All matches meant encouraging or motivating in a general coaching context (e.g., “positive and affirming,” “affirming us by name”). None referenced identity-affirming spaces.

“diverse” matches

Matches referenced body-size diversity, age diversity, or general participant variety. None specifically referenced LGBTQ+ diversity.

“safe space” matches

Matches described feeling safe as a beginner, in a martial arts context, or in a yoga vulnerability context. One exception noted below.

“accepting” matches

Used generically to describe studios welcoming of all fitness levels.

Genuinely LGBTQ+-relevant studios found

Only 1 studio had a review explicitly referencing LGBTQ+ identity:

Studio Venue ID Total reviews Relevant review excerpt
Sacred Space Astoria 111795 140 “I felt safe when I was in there as a trans person. It was a very relaxing session.”

This is the only review across all 80 candidates that specifically names an LGBTQ+ identity or explicitly connects the studio environment to LGBTQ+ safety and belonging.

Decision

1 qualifying studio < 3 required. Page generation skipped.

Generating a page with only one genuinely theme-relevant studio would not provide enough breadth to be useful to the target audience, and padding the page with studios whose “inclusive” or “diverse” reviews are generically fitness-related would misrepresent the data and potentially mislead LGBTQ+ community members seeking explicitly affirming spaces.

Recommendations for future extraction

  1. Expand keyword list: Consider adding terms like “rainbow,” “gay,” “lesbian,” “bisexual,” “two-spirit,” “drag,” “chosen family,” or “gender-affirming” to capture a wider range of explicitly LGBTQ+ language.
  2. Cross-reference with venue metadata: If studio profiles or tags indicate LGBTQ+-owned or LGBTQ+-focused businesses, those could be used as a secondary signal alongside review text.
  3. Revisit periodically: As the review corpus grows, more explicitly LGBTQ+-themed reviews may accumulate, especially in a market as large as New York.